Scholarly
Have great trust in their own ideas and how they apply them to knowledge as a whole. Strong focus on how they believe things operate. Continuously reevaluate the rules of logic in order to keep opinions up to date. Solely trust in their own ability to reason through any sort of puzzle or problem. Are quick to zone in on a causal links to the current state of reality. Easily receive high marks in academic arenas, sometimes challenging the grade scale’s status-quo. Tend to dislike arguing unless they can lead the discussion without being discounted.Quietly philosophize the meaning of life unless it’s useless to their current venture.
Puzzle Solving Role
Thrive in situations with a lot of chaotic and extraneous information. Always put forth unambiguous answers as to how and why things work. Have a strict guideline as to what qualifies as useful research or information. Have no problem instructing and teaching new ideas to others. Problem solvers who excel in formal academia. Always aware of unknown variables that other people are failing to see – quick to point them out.
Blind Spot
Have an always evolving program of understanding of the world that only they control – rarely letting others change their mind. Prone to correcting others’ mistakes rather than discussing merits of the problem. Have a hard time admitting when they’ve made a mistake. Refuse to change their opinion unless they can take credit for being involved in the thought shift. May fall into a know-it-all attitude. Discount others’ explanations until it can be verified for themselves.
Theoretical Breakdown
The 1L attitude is formed by placing the logic aspect (L) in the confident position (1st). Confident logic (1L) has a strong interest in its own concept of logic. All 1L types are sufficient at being involved in matters relating to the systems of the mind. They may be aggressive about their opinions on higher knowledge, political arguments, scientific thought and their own abilities to reason. These types tend to focus intently on the personal results that can be obtained from the inner workings of the mind which they use to solidify their logical analyses.
