Faux-Identicals generally appear to have similar attitudes towards all aspects, yet as they start to develop a closer bond, it becomes clear how different their processes and expected results are. If these types remain too close, they feel as the other is never truly listening or helping. This relation does not breed much conflict despite the influences of their opposing sextas. Where one partner is picky, the other is carefree, so they coexist in relative harmony. Most of the confusion in this pair occurs when identifying the most important results out of the same situation. Boredom ensues when the other talks at length about their interests.
Partners react similarly to each other’s dominant aspect because of the symmetry of the relation. One perceives the other as quite competent in their first priority and freely commends their attentiveness. There is a sense that they are alike except that the other partner took a flexible interest one step further and handles it with more seriousness. The results partner wants conciseness when the flexible partner discusses the aspect without any critical points. Meanwhile, the flexible partner thinks there is always a benefit to exploration, and therefore the results partner could afford to open their awareness of their dominant priority. Even if they do not naturally agree on what to do with their dominant aspects, Faux-identicals appreciate what the other contributes.
Unconfident areas of this relation also symmetrically differ in process and results. Where one partner is insecure in an aspect, the other is oblivious to it. Questioning the ability of everyone to handle a certain priority, the insecure person feels like the oblivious person does not take their concerns seriously. The oblivious person would rather the insecure person handle the aspect because they seem to care more about the details. If discussing the insecurities does not culminate in a way to move on, the oblivious person will determine the most important points to a result. Partners do not directly conflict over their unconfident areas as their oblivious aspects are very tolerant to extreme reactions. The Faux-identical relation illuminates how people can be similar but bring wildly different expectations to the relationship. Partners learn that people are not wrong for wanting a faster or slower pace to their priorities.